Democrats Get Ringing Endorsement ...

From terrorists. I'm not kidding. World Net Daily has a column out today that is absolutely amazing. A reporter stationed in Jerusalem is literally risking his life for his craft. He has interviewed known terrorists about their preferences in Tuesdays election. And not surprisingly they overwhelmingly support Democrats. Here's Aaron Klein:

Everybody has an opinion about next Tuesday's midterm congressional election in the U.S. – including senior terrorist leaders interviewed by WND who say they hope Americans sweep the Democrats into power because of the party's position on withdrawing from Iraq, a move, as they see it, that ensures victory for the worldwide Islamic resistance.

The terrorists told WorldNetDaily an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are "tired."

They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.

They said a withdrawal would also embolden their own terror groups to enhance "resistance" against Israel.

"Of course Americans should vote Democrat," Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, told WND.

This wasn't made up, this isn't Republican rhetoric. And it's kind of the elephant in the room in all this that the Democratic party's goals line up rather well with the terrorists. It's not PC to say it, the Democrat will go out screaming that yo are "questioning their patriotism" but it is absolutely true.

A better way to but it is that a vote for Democrats is harmful to our national security and interests. The war we are fighting has two fronts, a military front and a PR front. Terrorists and muslim extremists everywhere are encouraged and emboldened by Democratic claims that the war in Iraq is going badly and is being mis-handled. True or not saying anything that might help you "get Bush" does not help solve the situation. And in truth that's what it boils down to, Democrats do not want to solve the problems of Iraq, or as some of us would call it "win", they want to use the situation in Iraq as a political tool to bring themselves to power.

I was listening to NPR the other day(an accident I swear), and the host asked her guest, who was an advisor to a campaign on military affairs, and the host asked this guy: "Do you think winning in Iraq is even still an option?". I was astonished, when did losing become an option? And then I realized that losing meant a Republican failure and thus a windfall for the Democrats. Sad that it has come to this. It used to be that our differences ended at our borders, not so anymore I guess.

Turns out this isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened. Check out Ted Kennedy during the cold war.

I would also like to point out that this man Aaron Klein is a REAL journalist. You don't see this kind of reporting much. Most of the time the Drive-By Media just spews Democratic talking points, or calls up some Al-Quaeda members in Iraq and asks them for some video. Klein should be commended, please read his whole article and share it with your friends.

Linked to Stop The ACLU, Basils Blog, and Jo's Cafe.